|
||
| Kawasaki ZX-10R |
Page 1 of 4 I’ve read motorcycle reviews for many years now and I’ve long pondered how best to go about it. Do I include details like a 0.1 degree change in head angle from last years model? Is this something the average rider needs to know? Then it hit me…that’s the main criteria. Needs to know. Riding a motorcycle is vastly different from driving and riders abilities vary to massively. A regular rider simply doesn’t need this info. It’s highly unlikely they’d be able to confirm the change back to back. Maybe a seasoned test rider for a race team would pinpoint the changes but why on earth am I writing a review for them. They’re out racing, not staring at a computer screen. What the reader needs to know first up is what sort of rider the reviewer is, without this a review is useful but not as useful as you’d think. If Valentino Rossi complained about slightly weak power in the top 1000rpm of the latest superbike it would probably still be petrifying power to mere mortals. I like the top ten rating system. Take ten different riders of varying ability; riding sports bikes on a public road and where would you sit? I certainly wouldn’t be the fastest in this group, I'd probably be one up from the middle. Call if fourth place. The rider in first place would ride around me like I was a chicken standing dead still on the center of the road. Equally the rider in last place would think I was pretty mad.
|









